Some people have criticized the subject of philosophy for preventing the further development of science. But isn't it a massive misconception?

Yes it is a massive misconception to criticize philosophy for preventing the further development of science.

There is wisdom and love in philosophy that characterizes the human being that modern science denies.

Humanity is characterized by philosophy, which necessarily encompasses ethics, aesthetics and natural philosophy

It is ok to want to improve one’s life. There is a great deal of scope in the philosophical approach to science than one can give it credit for. What we call science today was known as natural philosophy a couple of centuries ago.

Science or modern science as it is known today did take a wrong turn when the “empiricists” discarded immanence from their perspective.

Modern science - as opposed to traditional perspectives of the cosmos - is fragmented.

How do we know that it is fragmented? Because it is framed within a set of questions that exclude critical parameters that deserve to be evaluated on its own merits.

Now, there is the connection between Fibonacci prime numbers and spirals which unmistakably expresses beauty. Does modern science recognize this?

Is there consciousness involved so as to bring about Fibonacci prime number spiral patterns in nature? Can optimization occur without consciousness behind it? The cosmos - Greek root word meaning “cosmetic” - is optimized for beauty.

https://phys.org/news/2013-02-nature-pattern-fibonacci.html

Consciousness of patterns is the distinction of human beings.

The Fibonacci pattern brings together consciousness, truth and beauty together at once.

There exist consciousness behind the cosmos that engenders the patterns that are displayed therein.

There is a being that is conscious that is the custodian of the cosmos.

The cosmos is the conjugate of this conscious being.

This consciousness is the custodian of the cosmos who has infused principles into it that engenders beauty in the cosmos.

The custodian of the cosmos yearns for beauty - like all humans do - and so the cosmos was created.

Can modern science come to the conclusions that I have spelled out? If it can, that is wonderful.

It is ok to create useful things just as long as the principles used to create those things conform to principles that engender beauty.

Here’s an example of useful beauty:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mop.29797?utm_campaign=Microwave_and_Optical_Technology_Letters_TrendMD_1&utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=TrendMD

Basic motivational ideas behind beauty can be found here:

https://phys.org/news/2011-10-beautiful-math-fractals.html?utm_source=TrendMD&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Phys.org_TrendMD_1

Perhaps some day we can be inspired by these:

https://www.academia.edu/42988393/The_Fibonacci_Pyramid_of_Gizahttps://secretenergy.com/the-pyramids-of-giza-were-the-source-of-ancient-free-energy/

The mathematics of heuristics involving beauty are shown below:


 

Mathematics of Conjugation involves Phi The Golden Number 

Source: Mathematics of Phi, 1.618, the Golden Number – https://www.goldennumber.net/math/ 

Algebra : If you square Phi, you get a number exactly 1 greater than itself: 2.618…, or Φ² = Φ + 1.          If you divide Phi into 1 to get its reciprocal, you get a number exactly 1 less than itself: 0.618…,

Φ² = Φ + 1

<=>  

1 / Φ = Φ – 1 

<=>  

Φ²- Φ– 1=0

 
Solving Φ² = Φ + 1 <=> Φ² - Φ - 1 = 0 gives 0.618 as solution to the equation.

This relationship is expressed mathematically as: A = B + C, and A / B = B / C. Set B=0.618, We A=1 and C=1-0.618=0.382 (1) ------ A/B=1/0.618 = (2) ------- B/C=0.618/0.382=0.618

Reference: 
Solve x^2-x-1=0 https://mathsolver.microsoft.com/en/solve-problem/%7B%20x%20%20%7D%5E%7B%202%20%20%7D%20%20-x-1%20%3D%20%200:

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Links blogged: The Fractal Nature of Consciousness, Intuition and Neural Networks

Science fulfills Aesthetics: To what extent can science explain what and why we don't know information about an area still to be understood by science?

What is required for acceptance that the supernatural has influened reality?